Lotto scamming

This type of scamming has moved from an individual act to gain quick cash, to a global investment scheme With mom top institutions, professionals and business officials involved in the manipulation of elders usually from within North America and Europe of huge sums of cash. A phone, laptop and access to personal information about the victims normally obtained from someone within the organizations that have information used by victims on online websites. This trade of lotto scam is illegal but yet its prevalence continues nonetheless because it gives those involved a means to survive, live lucrative and flashy lifestyles.

However, this attracts the government and international anti-crime officials ho seek to stop these individuals. Economic freedom postulated by Robert A. Lawson, is classified as the key to greater opportunity and an improved quality of life. It’s the freedom to choose how to produce, sell, and use your own resources, while respecting others’ rights to do the same. Economic empowerment is the capacity of individuals to participate in, contribute to and benefit from growth processes in ways that recognizes the value of their contributions, respect their dignity and make it possible to negotiate a fairer distribution of the benefits of Roth.

The writer thinks, with the definitions given above, that lotto scamming can and does serve the need for economic freedom and empowerment to an extent regardless of being illegal. Lotto scam literally gives the poorest of individuals the opportunity to attain riches in the shortest possible time without much work or effort. The down point of lotto scamming however, is that individuals and organizations have gained from the exploitation of others. So scampers benefit from the exploitation of others, but it can be argued that the victims had the redeem to choose whether or not to accept the lucrative offer posted by scampers in the first place.

Let’s be honest here many of the victims may have never entered or participated in a lottery in their lives, but yet they become victims of scam simply because they wanted to accept money from an unknown competition they had no clue about If the victims were actually getting something in return then it could be argued lotto scam is not a crime or problem cause no one would complain about getting money for practically doing nothing but reading and accepting a notification email or phone call.

Why isn’t it that the victims as freely as they were in accepting the scam is able to freely accept the consequences for their mistakes and greed. The mere fact that the government protects victims from being scammed doesn’t this limits victims from truly being free and making their own decisions and also it give these said victims a motive to accept the promised prices offered by scampers because if they are scammed in the end they have the protection of the government. From lotto scam individuals have established businesses, build houses, support their families, buy cars and the list goes on.

Economic freedom is achieved for the scampers when they get away with the act but once they are caught then that freedom is lost. They have the ability to choose freely whether or not they want to get involve in the act, and they are just as free to accept the consequences that accompany their decisions. For example as a scammed one has the freedom to gain wealth by all means necessary, regardless of how it one obtains that wealth, when this wealth is obtained, the scammed internalizes it has achieving his ability to gain economic stability, status and to a lesser extent power.

So if the government, another individual or a member of the anti-lottery scam task force stops this scammed from gaining the above mentioned attributes, then it would be seen as taking away his opportunity to be economically freed. Economic freedom here requires governments to refrain from taking people’s property and from interfering with personal choice, voluntary exchange, and the freedom to enter and compete in labor and product markets.

Hence lotto scamming if allowed to the scampers does enhance their economic freedom and empowerment. They are able to improve their standard of living and that of those around them. However, Lotto scamming makes the county an international target place, but for the wrong reasons. Although scampers are free in making their chooses, the consequences of those chooses are felt by the country at large, because international money lending agencies, tourists and investors think twice about wanting to come to the country.

The country gets labeled for the free choice of the scampers. But it raises the question of whose freedom is more As emphasized by Samuel Morison in NYU Journal of Law important? And Liberty Volvo. L, he stated that Hayes allows that the concept of social justice eight be intelligible within the context of a command economy, in which the distribution of resources is, at least in theory, the deliberate choice of a central authority.

He argues, however, on positive economic grounds that serious attempts to achieve any pre-determined pattern of in- come or wealth through state-sponsored redistribution will invariably have disastrous moral, political, and economic consequences. In other words or rather in the words of the scampers, they cannot wait on the government to provide them with the economic freedom and empowerment they need, furthermore it’s not expected that the government can/ will provide the type of economic satisfaction that suits the interest of everyone.

Although brief, the evidence provided above attempted to show how the trade of lotto scam contribute to economic freedom and empowerment. The scammed gains freedom and empowerment once his plan succeeds, but this freedom is lost when intercepted by officials.